Motor finance repossession: Proving forbearance and compliance

Taking back a vehicle comes at a high cost, both for the lender and the customer. The FCA views this as a poor outcome because losing a car often means losing the ability to work or manage family life.

Under FCA rules, you must prove that repossession was the only viable remaining option and that more proportional alternatives have been fully explored.

The burden of proof: From process to outcomes

Historically, a repossession audit involved a manual look-back at call recordings, letters sent, and payment history. Under the Consumer Duty, this reactive approach is a risk. The regulator is now looking for evidence of proactive forbearance.

If your collections operation relies on an older collections system or is run through a billing application, providing this evidence is an uphill battle. Siloed data makes it nearly impossible to tell a chronological story of the customer journey. This leaves lenders vulnerable to claims of unfair treatment or inadequate support and potentially incurring hefty fines.

Proving compliance: Evidence of forbearance

Modern motor finance operations are replacing manual sampling with a continuous audit trail that provides a thread of evidence for every account. This is a real-time, digital record of every interaction, offer, and assessment made during the life of the arrears.

The amount of data that you get out of event-driven systems means that it's really easy to produce anything that the regulators may want to see, really quickly and simply.

Jemma Holland, Billing Finance

To satisfy the FCA that repossession is truly a last resort, lenders should be able to provide a robust audit trail that covers these critical areas of evidence:

1. Lowering barriers to engagement 

Under Consumer Duty, lenders must ensure customers aren't met with ‘unreasonable barriers.’ You need to prove that the customer was offered low-friction, inclusive ways to communicate. An audit trail logs these digital touchpoints, proving that the lender attempted to lower the barriers to communication.

2. Accurate affordability data

The FCA's CONC 7.3 requires lenders to show ‘due consideration’ and offer ‘appropriate’ forbearance. By utilising Open Banking, you replace guesswork with objective data.

This proves that any arrangement offered – or the decision to proceed to recovery – was based on the customer’s actual ability to pay.

3. Informed decision-making (VT & Surrender)

Good outcomes rely on the customer understanding their options. You must demonstrate that the customer was aware of their rights under the Consumer Credit Act.

Modern collections software can provide digital journey logs showing the customer was presented with clear information regarding Voluntary Termination (VT) and Voluntary Surrender before the contract was terminated.

4. The last resort documentation

Before an asset is recovered, the burden of proof rests with the lender to show that all other avenues have been exhausted.

A comprehensive, chronological summary of every intervention becomes your primary defence during an FCA thematic review or a Financial Ombudsman complaint.

Test your compliance readiness with our 5-minute Compliance Health Check

Compliance as asset protection

A robust audit trail can protect your firm’s reputation and balance sheet. By replacing legacy systems with specialised debt management software, lenders move away from a manual scramble for evidence and toward a state of constant, automated audit-readiness.

In a sector defined by high-value collateral and high-stakes regulation, the ability to prove you acted with empathy and precision is the only way to move toward recovery with confidence.

Find out more about what modern collections software can do to improve outcomes and resilience.